Current:Home > ScamsWisconsin Supreme Court to decide whether mobile voting vans can be used in future elections -ProfitClass
Wisconsin Supreme Court to decide whether mobile voting vans can be used in future elections
SignalHub View
Date:2025-04-10 09:40:33
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Wisconsin Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments Tuesday in a case brought by Republicans who want to bar the use of mobile voting vans in the presidential battleground state.
Such vans — a single van, actually — were used just once, in Racine in 2022. It allowed voters to cast absentee ballots in the two weeks leading up to the election. Racine, the Democratic National Committee and others say nothing in state law prohibits the use of voting vans.
Whatever the court decides will not affect the November election, as a ruling isn’t expected until later and no towns or cities asked to use alternative voting locations for this election before the deadline to do so passed. But the ruling will determine whether mobile voting sites can be used in future elections.
Republicans argue it is against state law to operate mobile voting sites, that their repeated use would increase the chances of voter fraud, and that the one in Racine was used to bolster Democratic turnout.
Wisconsin law prohibits locating any early voting site in a place that gives an advantage to any political party. There are other limitations on early voting sites, including a requirement that they be “as near as practicable” to the clerk’s office.
For the 2022 election, Racine city Clerk Tara McMenamin and the city “had a goal of making voting accessible to as many eligible voters as possible, and the voting locations were as close as practicable to the municipal clerk’s office while achieving that goal and complying with federal law,” the city’s attorney argued in filings with the court.
Racine purchased its van with grant money from the Center for Tech and Civic Life, a nonprofit funded by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife. Republicans have been critical of the grants, calling the money “Zuckerbucks” that they say was used to tilt turnout in Democratic areas.
Wisconsin voters in April approved a constitutional amendment banning the use of private money to help run elections.
The van was used only to facilitate early in-person voting during the two weeks prior to an election, McMenamin said. She said the vehicle was useful because it was becoming too cumbersome for her staff to set up their equipment in remote polling sites.
It traveled for two weeks across the city, allowing voters to cast in-person absentee ballots in 21 different locations.
Racine County Republican Party Chairman Ken Brown, represented by the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, filed a complaint the day after the August 2022 primary with the Wisconsin Elections Commission, arguing that the van was against state law. He argued that it was only sent to Democratic areas in the city in an illegal move to bolster turnout.
McMenamin disputed those accusations, saying that it shows a misunderstanding of the city’s voting wards, which traditionally lean Democratic.
“Whether McMenamin’s intention was to create this turnout advantage for Democrats or not, that is precisely what she did through the sites she selected,” Brown argued in a brief filed with the state Supreme Court.
The elections commission dismissed the complaint four days before the 2022 election, saying there was no probable cause shown to believe the law had been broken. Brown sued.
What to know about the 2024 Election
- Today’s news: Follow live updates from the campaign trail from the AP.
- Ground Game: Sign up for AP’s weekly politics newsletter to get it in your inbox every Monday.
- AP’s Role: The Associated Press is the most trusted source of information on election night, with a history of accuracy dating to 1848. Learn more.
Brown sued, and in January, a Racine County Circuit Court judge sided with Republicans, ruling that state election laws do not allow for the use of mobile voting sites.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court in June kept that ruling in place pending its consideration of the case, which effectively meant the use of mobile voting sites would not be allowed in the upcoming presidential election. The court also kept in place the same rules that have been in place since 2016 for determining the location of early voting sites. The deadline for selecting those sites for use in the November election was in June.
veryGood! (493)
Related
- Tropical rains flood homes in an inland Georgia neighborhood for the second time since 2016
- Mike McCarthy's return from appendectomy could be key to Cowboys' massive matchup vs. Eagles
- Alo Yoga's 40% Off Sale Has Bras Starting at $34 & We Can't Click Fast Enough
- Should employers give workers housing benefits? Unions are increasingly fighting for them.
- Tropical weather brings record rainfall. Experts share how to stay safe in floods.
- A pilot is killed in a small plane crash near Eloy Municipal Airport; he was the only person aboard
- Winners and losers of first NBA In-Season Tournament: Lakers down Pacers to win NBA Cup
- Germany’s Scholz confident of resolving budget crisis, says no dismantling of the welfare state
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- Third victim ID'd in UNLV shooting as college professors decry 'national menace'
Ranking
- Jorge Ramos reveals his final day with 'Noticiero Univision': 'It's been quite a ride'
- Where the Republican presidential candidates stand on Israel and Ukraine funding
- Hundreds of Georgians march in support of country’s candidacy for European Union membership
- Hong Kong holds first council elections under new rules that shut out pro-democracy candidates
- How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
- Thousands demonstrate against antisemitism in Berlin as Germany grapples with a rise in incidents
- 'Wait Wait' for December 9, 2023: With Not My Job guest Fred Schneider
- The NRA has a surprising defender in its free speech case before the Supreme Court: the ACLU
Recommendation
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
US vetoes UN resolution backed by many nations demanding immediate humanitarian cease-fire in Gaza
Two Indiana police officers are acquitted of excessive force in 2020 protesters’ arrests
A year after lifting COVID rules, China is turning quarantine centers into apartments
Olympic women's basketball bracket: Schedule, results, Team USA's path to gold
Israel presses on with Gaza bombardments, including in areas where it told civilians to flee
Packers have big salary-cap and roster decisions this offseason. Here's what we predict
At COP28, sticking points remain on fossil fuels and adapting to climate as talks near crunch time